Public Deliberation

Public Deliberation

How the public can and will make decisions about climate engineering is not yet clear.  What are the mechanisms for public consideration of climate engineering research and deployment proposals? How will public preferences be involved in decision-making processes?  The Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment works with research organizations globally to explore methods and best practices for meaningful public deliberation.

 

Recent Blogs

Governance, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management

Should geoengineering be considered a global public good?

Carbon Dioxide Removal, Education, Governance, NGO and Policy Engagement, Politics, Public Deliberation

When essential research might be a bad thing. The carbon removal research dilemma.

Commentary, Politics, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management

Power and Responsibility in a Broken World

Education, Governance, NGO and Policy Engagement, Public Deliberation

Climate Engineering Conference 2017

Governance, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management

Evoking equity as a rationale for solar geoengineering research? Scrutinizing emerging expert visions of equity

Politics, Public Deliberation

The Developing World and Climate Engineering: Unevenly Affected and Underrepresented

Public Perception

A Response to “The Uninhabitable Earth”

Civil Society, NGO and Policy Engagement, Politics, Public Deliberation

The People’s Climate March

Education, Governance, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management

What a “post-truth” media ecology means for climate engineering research – Holly Jean Buck

Governance, Politics, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management

Forum Discussion- Rhode Island H 7578: The Climate Geoengineering Act of 2016

Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management

Who May Geoengineer: Self-defense, Civil Disobedience, and Revolution (Part One) – Patrick Taylor Smith

Carbon Dioxide Removal, Politics, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management, Understanding Negative Emissions Technologies

After Paris, time for an honest conversation – Simon Nicholson

Carbon Dioxide Removal, CDR vs SRM, Governance, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Understanding Negative Emissions Technologies

Why we shouldn’t be in a hurry to redefine ‘climate engineering’ – Duncan McLaren

BECCS, Carbon Dioxide Removal, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management, Understanding Negative Emissions Technologies

Atmosphere of Hope reviewed- Holly J. Buck

Civil Society, Governance, NGO and Policy Engagement, Politics, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management

The ‘Lomborg gambit’ and why the allure of solar geoengineering must be resisted by the Paris negotiators – Prof John Shepherd CBE FRS and Andy Parker

BECCS, Carbon Dioxide Removal, Civil Society, NGO and Policy Engagement, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Understanding Negative Emissions Technologies

What of 2C? – Aaron Kressig

Politics, Public Deliberation, Public Perception, Solar Radiation Management

The Planet Remade: Reviewed – Duncan McLaren

Civil Society, Governance, NGO and Policy Engagement, Politics, Public Deliberation, Public Perception

phone chat: Dan Sarewitz and Jane Flegal

Civil Society, Governance, NGO and Policy Engagement, Politics, Public Deliberation, Solar Radiation Management

Reflecting on the “Berlin Declaration” – Andy Parker (with Oliver Morton and George Collins)

Civil Society, Governance, NGO and Policy Engagement, Politics, Public Deliberation, Public Perception

Measuring NGO Response to NAS Climate Intervention Reports – Rachael Somerville