In thinking about the governance of climate engineering, it is crucial to recognize that “governance” is a broader term than “regulation.” Regulation typically involves formal laws and policies imposed by governments or international organizations, often backed by the threat of criminal penalties or other formal sanctions. Regulation is one type of governance but certainly not the only one. FCEA understands governance to include any system of formal or informal rules intended to control or influence research into or deployment of climate engineering, either internationally, transnationally, within a single country, or within nongovernmental organizations or civil society more broadly. Examples of non-regulatory governance mechanisms include non-binding resolutions by intergovernmental organizations; voluntary codes of conduct for researchers; rules and requirements imposed by funders, universities, or professional associations; memoranda of understandings between nongovernmental organizations, governments, or international organizations; and so on.
The international human right to science and its application to geoengineering research and innovation- Kristin Barham & Anna-Maria Hubert
August 9, 2016Announcing a new Academic Working Group on International Governance of Solar Climate Engineering
March 1, 2016Why We Should Treat SRM and CDR Separately – Joshua B. Horton
December 16, 2015Why we shouldn’t be in a hurry to redefine ‘climate engineering’ – Duncan McLaren
December 15, 2015The ‘Lomborg gambit’ and why the allure of solar geoengineering must be resisted by the Paris negotiators – Prof John Shepherd CBE FRS and Andy Parker
December 3, 2015phone chat: Dan Sarewitz and Jane Flegal
October 6, 2015A talk by Holly J Buck – Why Climate Engineering and Sustainable Agriculture Need to Be Part of the Same Conversation
October 1, 2015Reflecting on the “Berlin Declaration” – Andy Parker (with Oliver Morton and George Collins)
July 16, 2015Solar Radiation Management: Foresight for Governance (SRM4G) – Miranda Boettcher & Sean Low
July 16, 2015Measuring NGO Response to NAS Climate Intervention Reports – Rachael Somerville
February 26, 2015The Limitations of a Human Rights Framework – Patrick Taylor Smith
February 26, 2015Five Take-home Points from the NAS “Climate Intervention” Report – Simon Nicholson
February 18, 2015Climate engineering as a Right-Wing Technology, and Other Stories – Holly Buck
February 15, 2015Civil Society statements on release of NAS “Climate Intervention” reports
February 10, 2015Wading into a Murky Debate on Transparency – Nigel Moore
February 3, 2015Keuntungan & Kerugian main-main Judi Bola88 Online di Internet
December 1, 2014Forum – Where does the climate geoengineering conversation go from here?
November 13, 2014Engineering the World Climatic System: Transdisciplinarity, Interdisciplinarity and Uncertainties – Guest Post – Dr. Cush Ngonzo Luwesi, Kenyatta University, Kenya
September 17, 2014Methane, volcanoes, and the end of the world- GUEST POST- DUNCAN MCLAREN -UNIVERSITY OF LANCASTER
August 26, 2014